A thought to consider as the report is read by many:
"Just because a behavior is done in the past does not mean that the behavior is or was appropriate."
There is a law for that. Title VII, hostile work environment, and other regulations set forth by the US EEOC.
The next factor to examine is the related historical behaviors of both players. Incognito v. Martin
Martin: History of Depression, Suicidal Ideations, Anxiety, and Self-described internal social issues (self-belief vs. actual belief of outside world). Martin has admitted to Marijuana and Alcohol use within the report.
Incognitio: Self reported history of aggression beyond the sport; organizational history of aggression by teams; impulse control issues as exhibited by the report of behavioral misconduct/harassment based upon unwanted touch of a female volunteer during a charity event; impulsive behavior during social gatherings; aggressive verbal behavior and threats during communications in the locker room; loud, aggressive, and having lack of boundaries or a filter as described by a teammate; history of depression and anxiety; and a demonstration of cross addictive behaviors (stimulant/depressant behaviors such as drinking coffee (stimulant) and later drinking alcohol (depressant)). Alcohol, caffeine, and marijuana all have an impact upon serotonin in the brain and may impact behavior. Alcohol and caffeine have a certain "shelf life" until the user seeks out more of the chemical. Incognito self reported that he utilized alcohol (a known depressant) while taking Paxil a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor or SSRI (a known treatment for depression designed to increase serotonin levels in the brain).
Why is all of this important - do we really need science to explain an athlete's behavior?
Well, yes and no. No to the fact that the behavior occurred without a logical explanation of why. Yes in the sense that the pre-frontal cortex (the area behind your forehead) is responsible for memory and cognition. This is where we begin to interprete the how and why we do what we do and our understanding of our life's situation (perceptions). When professional athletes experience a concussion, they may experience a traumatic brain injury which may impede the athlete's cognitive functioning.
TBI is typically described in terms of mild or moderate/severe with definitions varying. Mild to moderate cognitive impairments are generally defined as:
(i) an external blow to the frontal lobe and brain;
(ii) has experienced confusion, disorientation, or loss of consciousness for less than 30 minutes; and
(iii) post-traumatic amnesia experience for less than 24 hours.
Additional symptomatology includes behavioral changes which include:
(i) Aggression or increased aggression not related to the actual sport;
(ii) Disinhibition or lacking a social and emotional filter
(iii) Difficulties setting appropriate life rules to live by and follow.
As researchers, we look for behavioral clues to determine potential causes for the behaviors. We will preface this by stating we are not creating a diagnosis for any athlete involved in the Dolphins incidents; rather, we are simply pointing out some well known symptomatological information pertaining to head trauma and TBI. Brain injuries can range from a contusion to subarachnoid hemorrhage. Additionally, there are behavioral changes related to TBI which come into play. These include increased aggression, lack of self-regulation, and difficulties setting appropriate social boundaries. Lacking a filter, even as the individual recognized that the behavior is inappropriate or unacceptable while continuing the behavior, is a function of dysregulation. Incognito, by all accounts, had many of these symptoms throughout his playing career. Diagnosed or undiagnosed a second truth could be stated:
"That said, if Incognito does have a disability, the disability does not take away accountability for one's own actions."
Each athlete is responsible for their own behaviors and attitudes in the locker room and in the community. Having a potential mental health or physical disability does not allow athletes to utilize an anything goes attitude as described in the report. Part of having a mental health disorder is learning to apply filters successfully to all areas of the athlete's life. It is called boundaries. It also is called seeking treatment and sticking with the treatment plan. If the treatment is not working the athlete should continue to seek medical care until the symptoms are resolved.
Pages 59-65: Clues
The report outlines medical information relating to each athlete which circles us back to pages 59-65 of the report. Again, this is not a diagnosis of an athlete, rather an examination of the symptomatology related to a disability which may or may not have been diagnosed. Research requires clues in order to create solid explanations which are not used as excuses for behavior. In the end, even with disabilities, indiividuals have choices and individual responsibilities for their own actions. The willing participants in these workplace violations clearly violated organizational workplace rules and federal statutes regarding hostile work environment found in Title VII and other EEO laws and regulations.
The report states that their is a uniqueness of the NFL locker room. Past history has shown that although sports is a unique workplace; the uniqueness of the NFL locker room is no different than the uniqueness of an Army Unit in the forward position of a battle or war where much of the action takes place. Each specific type of organization has a game plan and a "battle" to win. As an Army veteran, it was always more important to follow the rules and plan a winning strategy in order to win the "war". The "battle" was always only one step towards a winning outcome. How employees go about winning the "battle" is crucial to the successful outcome of the "war". So it goes in football. It is only then that true job satisifaction occurs.
For more information about the report, please go to: Report Dated February 14, 2014